Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Esme Fae's avatar

My theory is that it has to do with women on average being more agreeable (in the Big 5 personality trait sense) than men.

I think the average person, whether male or female) tends to not give a huge amount of thought or obsessive research to abstract things like principles and political ideology; they just sort of go along with whatever the norms in their geographic area and socioeconomic group are. Now, as obsessive nerds like me realize, these norms tend to be a bit incoherent and contradictory, but publicly deviating from whatever your tribe believes can get you a lot of raised eyebrows. Women are more sensitive to possible repercussions from failure to fit in; and most girls learn pretty early on that it’s best to just agree with whatever the dominant female in your group says, whether it’s “On Wednesdays we wear pink” or “Transwomen are actual women!” or “Burn the witch!”

In our current society, the loudest female voices tend to be leftists; which is interesting. Historically, I think the dominant females tended to be the older women and we still have the cultural tropes of the Prim and Proper Spinster, the Stern Librarian, and Busybody Old Lady who used to enforce society’s norms. But these days, our society is much more fragmented and age-segregated; we no longer have grandmas chaperoning dances and kids don’t hang out in libraries any more. Younger generations spend far more time online, but there aren’t many Prim and Proper Old Ladies on TikTok or X so the dominant female voices tend to the more ardent leftists. The more moderate or conservative women tend to not spend as much time; possibly because they have families and jobs and stuff to do - so the loud voices are heavily skewed to journalists and activists who don’t seem to have much else to do. I notice that among my cohort (50ish); the single, never married ladies are the ones who spend the most time posting angry political crap on Facebook, while the rest of us just want to post pictures of our kids and pets and what we ate for lunch.

I think men are also prone to just going along with the dominant view in their milieu; but men are in general somewhat less sensitive to possible rejection by peers for disagreement. I am a woman who has a lot of male friends, and I’ve noticed that men feel pretty free to disagree with each other, and often seem to enjoy a bit of argument. However, that sort of thing can be quite distressing to women; I remember how my female friends who played on a coed ultimate frisbee team were very concerned about some of the male players who were prone to arguing about the rules, and wondered if something should be done before it “destroyed their friendship.” They were also concerned about the other male players who were “caught in the middle” and how the arguments were affecting them. My husband was one of the other male players and he laughed when I told him this - he said the only way the arguments affected him was he sometimes became annoyed that the disputes delayed actually playing the game. It didn’t bother him in the slightest that his friends were arguing; but most women have a visceral reaction to disagreements within their group.

So I think maybe men are inclined to be broadly liberal or conservative depending on who they hang out with; but are more likely to reject particular notions that don’t really jibe with their observations and experiences so they don’t necessarily toe the “official” party line. For example, I live in a very liberal/progressive area; but some of my male friends who would describe themselves as liberal or progressive politically also like guns, don’t think transwomen should be in competing in women’s sports, and enjoy listening to Joe Rogan even if they don’t necessarily agree with all of his guests - all of which would be considered forbidden “right wing” behavior by most liberal/leftist young women.

Expand full comment
COMRADITY's avatar

The self-esteem study finding that more egalitarian cultures have wider gender difference in self-esteem is interesting and I think could be central to the widening political gender differences in Western countries.

I once heard Cokie Roberts and Steve Roberts (married and respected journalists) talk about what makes women and men different. Cokie said that she thought the key difference was that Steve was much more confident in making an argument, on the fly, so to speak, than she. She said she needed to feel more “buttoned up” - more research and analysis. She said this could be because of lower self-esteem and because, as a woman, she anticipated more criticism of her opinions. (I say “and” not “or” because both feed off each other)

Consider that if today’s women feel the same, they are more likely to “go down the rabbit hole” on the Internet to research issues. They are therefore more vulnerable to the algorithms designed to incite reactions (so they keep clicking) instead of making sense of “too much information” (so they stop clicking).

Liberal arguments are more likely to thrive by going down the rabbit hole because they tend to be more theoretical. Conservative arguments are more practical, antithetical to wasting time going down the rabbit hole.

Expand full comment
41 more comments...

No posts